Well done, you have omitted huge chunks of both YOUR post AND my post in response to change the context to suit your argument. CONGRATULATIONS. You are the worst type of debater. Let's take a trip down memory lane, shall we?
Your post^ followed by my response.
I was stating, what to me seemed like, a pretty funny comparison between the support team and the community that they support staff prefer fighting wars, whereas the community prefer recruiting wins. As per your own wording.
And yet you removed ALL context, by clipping from both posts. So again I congratulate you. [Insert slow clap here].
The rule is a trial attempt to address the often unheard concerns of the players who complain about the issues that are at the core of poor and unfair gameplay that the rule is an attempt to move away from ie. aligning huge portions of the world at unfair ratios to remove the competition for victory. Saying that the community as a whole disagrees with this rule because 5 of you are arguing it is quite literally the worst sample grouping, because there are only like 5 of you arguing on the forums against it out of hundreds or thousands of active players. Then you need to take into consideration that there are 3 members of the support team arguing for the rule, if you ignore that support are support and consider they are players too, that means 37.5% of this community are for and 62.5% are against. Still, really terrible sample sizing though.