Here we have people that admit to having more then one account.....Coiner's and somehow manage to pull resource's and unit's out of thin air........Now a new vague rule........
Who admitted to multi accounts?Here we have people that admit to having more then one account
Coiners are important to the game as they fund everyone who doesn't coin allowing everyone else to play for free. That's easy if you coin, you send resources to the village ahead of time from your other villages and then you simply coin the troops to being fully completed shortly after they die. It's even easier if you know for sure that your nuke is on a suicide run to begin with.Coiner's and somehow manage to pull resource's and unit's out of thin air
I'll play devils advocate and say that they (the Mods) MIGHT be working on a clear definition right now, that may be why we haven't seen much mention of it for a while from them, other then the joking in the forum about it of course.
However I do have to agree that I prefer clear rules, easier to know when someone is cheating and easier to avoid cheating.
Time and MONEY.So with these two, why is the tribe limit set at 200? its ok to individually recruit each member but not ok to recruit a tribe?
and why is it against the rules to find ALTERNATE methods to win a world as opposed to straight up hammer smashing somebodies face?
and if you must know i much perfer tribes of less than 40, but i still stand firmly against this rule because god damnit this is AMERICA! LAND OF THE FREE! so we should have the freedom to win how we want to win. if those other people want to complain about 200 people controlling 80% of the world maybe they should have fought harder! or you know there's always the new world the next month
So where are these players that expressed it and why are they not defending it? ive seen 1 member support it. and i have seen many more who said they were against it. oh yeah and they didn't even give any kind of argument to support it
My biggest concern for this is instead of actually improving the game play, say limiting tribe numbers, giving incentives for fighting it out, and winning wars. you are alienating those who have been fighting for months from actually getting something out of the worlds they have spent so much time in.
Well said my friend. Well said.It's been what? Almost 2 weeks since this rule was publicized? And yet there is still no clear definition of this rule. It shouldn't be that flipping hard to define the rule. Simply put, all tribe merges are against the rules? But originally, it was tribes who merged to win were against the rule. SO what is IT?! I was told by JPEX that any tribal merges were against the rule. BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT THE RULE STATES. This rule needed clear definition and it needed it before it was ever publicized PERIOD. What is the point of being a game moderator if you can't do your job and MODERATE? Get it done already. The length of time that this has taken is unprofessional. Rule changes should be created and defined in a clear and professional manner. And it simply is not that case with this new rule. The vagueness of this rule and it's publication in the forums is amateur at best, and it is still not being taken care of. It's almost comical how this is being handled.
I agree with Outta 100 %Time and MONEY.
When a company takes money from a customer, Said company has a responsibility to provide to the customer that which was paid for. Now that support is pushing this rule that has no exact structure, they have given them the power to take out whoever they want for whatever reason they want.
As for me - I will not buy 1 crown until this is resolved. As soon as I can not keep up for lack of coins, I will find another game to play. This is getting just too messed up.
That's funny. The ads for the game and the sign-up page make no mention of it not being a finished game. And, considering that there is a BETA server, and that is not the server we are all playing on, I kind of thought that it actually was a finished game. Especially since they are selling crowns and making money from it.Well this is not a finished game, so there will always be new things coming out that have the chance of dramatically changing the aspects of the game, and even some that change it near its core.
I disagree. I think it should apply to all NEW worlds.I hope you are correct because the mods will have no credibility in the community until a clear definition of their new rule is properly posted and they apply the same standards to all tribes on all worlds.
Question 10: what is meant by "during Tribe Domination"?
70% OF ALL VILLAGES???Answer: When the 1st ranked Tribe hits an ownership of 70% of the villages, we will start the Tribe Domination phase for this realm. During this time (Tribe Domination) any merges will not be accepted for ANY tribe.