Because most of IKO is very casual and has already quit. so despite the large looking numbers...Its been me and 2-3 other guys the entire time. And now the world is over because O-P disbanded out tribe. very toxic players. They wonder why the game is dying haha
No, they are literally red. meaning no one is playing them, including coops. entirely inactive. the vast majority of them were red or yellow. My coops are all real people who still play. I am talking to them now about what we are going to do. at the end of the day O-P just showed the type of people they are. They want this game to die.
Perhaps you forget but our player could see who was showing as inactive. He knew who was communicating and who was not. He has messages with IKO players saying 'sorry i am on 5 accounts at the moment' So when you say no one was playing them and they were all red ... well that's just not true is it
These inactive players should have been kicked but that just wasn't going to happen so our player did it for you. I don't know how you can throw shade on us for doing something that your tribe should have already done.
This action has only affected you and 2-3 other players. Is it really then that big a deal? all we did was remove the temptation for you and your 3 active members to use the troops and resources of inactive players; which of course would have been against the rules of the game.
You are in contact with these other players so you can just form another tribe.
You didn't contribute one honor point to IKO so you personally had no Crown investment in it
So to re-cap:
- You lost tribe levels you didn't contribute to,
- You have had no co ops helping to run your own account so you didn't lose any co ops; and
- Because you cannot co op inactive players
you lost at most the co ops of the 3 active players in your tribe.
- the 3 active players who did not co op you, well they lost at the most the other 2 co ops
I see messages from you to our players trying to sow discontent and i have no problem with that you can do what you want but i question what was actually 'lost' here if the tribe was as inactive as you say it was